The Society Against Legal Injustice Goes To Bat For a Fallen American Hero: OJ Simpson


USC Running Back

No matter what your opinion of OJ Simpson, his case in Las Vegas is the epitome of social injustice. This case was originated by motives of greed by the instigator of the incident, Thomas Riccio. From there, political opportunity was created for the District Attorney, Judge and Jury to right what some in our society consider to be a wrong from OJ Simpson's 1995 acquittal in Los Angeles . Everyone deserves to be treated fairly based on current circumstances, and the fact is this is far from what happened to OJ Simpson in Las Vegas .

Thomas Riccio worked very aggressively to set the meeting in Palace Station up by calling the Simpson home daily for approximately three months prior. He then taped the episode and sold it to TMZ.com for a six figure profit and eventually wrote a book about the meeting to realize further profit. It was not OJ Simpson's idea to set up the 6 minute meeting at Palace Station in Las Vegas – Thomas Riccio promoted and facilitated the meeting through the eyes of greed and exploitation of OJ Simpson.

From there, political opportunism was in the air. Las Vegas police detectives, the District Attorney David Roger, and Judge Jackie Glass put a full scale kangaroo court into action. One detective was recorded on tape stating “This is great. California can't get him. Now we'll be able to.”. OJ was then charged by District Attorney David Roger with a myriad of robbery charges as well as kidnapping while cutting deals with the co-defendents in the case in exchange for testimony against OJ. Meanwhile, the co-defendents all had checkered legal pasts and criminal records. Additionally, two of the co-defendents that had plea bargain deals cut were the ones that allegedly possessed weapons, while OJ had no weapon in his possession and no knowledge of any of the co-defendents having one. On December 5, 2008, Judge Glass sentenced OJ Simpson to anywhere between 9 and 33 years in prison. On the following Tuesday, December 9, 2008, Judge Glass sentenced all four accomplishes to nothing more than probation and fines. The mere act of cutting the plea bargains with the two that possessed weapons in exchange for testimony against OJ Simpson is evidence of the Las Vegas legal system unfairly targeting OJ. From a logical standpoint, if OJ knew weapons were involved, why would he want and need 5 people with him in the room? It doesn't take much logical reasoning to know that a person intending to hold someone against their will with a deadly weapon would want a minimal amount of witnesses.


Buffalo Bills Running Back

The head detective, Andy Caldwell, stated that OJ should have notified police about his stolen memorabilia. That argument would stand up under normal circumstances. However, this is OJ Simpson and by the comment made by one of the Las Vegas detectives on tape it is not hard to fault OJ for knowing he would get little or no help from police. Furthermore, and most significantly, Bruce Fromong and Alfred Beardsley, the “victims” that had OJ sports memorabilia, were long time acquaintances of OJ and two people whom OJ regarded as casual friends. OJ did not want to call law enforcement on two people he had considered friends for many years – he wanted to confront them and call them out on their actions instead of turning friends over to police.


Judge Jackie Glass

District Attorney David Roger recognized this as an opportunity to make himself world famous and proceeded to charge OJ with everything that he possibly could no matter how thin a legal thread it was based upon. People go into banks, rob them at gunpoint, and do not face a charge such as kidnapping. Furthermore, who is OJ Simpson going to kidnap and how is he going to do it? Where is he going to take them and hold them against his will and not be recognized? And what would OJ Simpson have gained by kidnapping the two alleged victims?

The jury selection process overseen by Judge Jackie Glass was the next step in the process. Judge Glass allowed the prosecution to strike the last two African American jurors and allowed the seating of the jury foreman that had previously been dismissed at his job at a local beverage plant for racially disparaging comments. Additionally, Judge Glass would not allow defense attorneys to probe prospective jurors opinions about OJ Simpson and his prior Los Angeles case in depth because “it would take too long”. Judge Glass stated “if we start going into the whys and hows of everything we will be here for three weeks and we're not going to do that”. When charging someone with crimes like armed robbery and kidnapping, wouldn't a reasonable mind deem it to be fair to be as thorough as possible in assembling an unbiased and just jury? Meanwhile, Judge Glass defends and stands by her role in the jury selection process and maintains a just jury was assembled.

The unfairness levied against OJ Simpson in Las Vegas is something no citizen deserves. Should have OJ Simpson, considering his celebrity and notoriety from his Los Angeles case, allowed himself to be put in this situation? No. However, OJ Simpson's act of letting his guard down and making himself vulnerable to people that want to profit off of him in no way makes him deserving of the legal injustice imposed on him by less than professional and competent Las Vegas detectives, prosecutors, judge and jury.

The appeal of OJ Simpson's conviction of all “charges” in Las Vegas is being estimated to eventually cost over $1,000,000 and take a year or longer. OJ Simpson is not a wealthy man anymore and is therefore largely at the mercy of the Las Vegas legal system. Therefore, the Society Against Legal Injustice asks you, as a fan, friend or admirer of OJ Simpson to make a modest contribution to the Society's Trust Fund via the secure link shown CLICK HERE. No contribution is too small: $5, $10, $20, $50, whatever you are comfortable with would be welcomed by the Society. Everyone deserves to be treated fairly by the law, and OJ Simpson is no exception.


OJ and his daughter Sydney

 

 
 
Copyright © 2009 Society Against Legal Injustice, Inc.